🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.